Carbon footprint of frontier AI models per query and per token

Factor version soma-ai-ef-2026.10-dataset-v3.0.0, dated . Location-based grid averages, not renewable contracts. Estimates from published benchmarks.

How much CO₂ does one query to a frontier model emit?

One query of 1210 tokens to a frontier model (class C: gpt-4, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-5) emits about 0.2 g CO₂e on the global-average grid, counting electricity, the share of server hardware, data-centre construction and amortised training; a million tokens emit 0.147 kg CO₂e. Served from EU North - Sweden the same query emits 0.037 g; from Asia Pacific - Singapore, 0.21 g.

For comparison on the same grid, a class A (small) query emits 0.016 g and a class B (mid-size) query emits 0.053 g. Class C uses 0.26546404032860343 kWh of facility electricity per million tokens, including the facility overhead (PUE) of 1.20.

Class C factors by cloud region

Per million tokens unless stated. Hardware 0.00388 kg, construction 0.00169 kg and training 0.01284 kg are the same in every region and are included in the total. Per query = 1210 tokens.
RegionElectricity kgTotal kg CO₂eg per queryWater LmL per query
Asia Pacific - Japan0.130770.1490.20.7931.1
Asia Pacific - Singapore0.132960.1510.21not availablenot available
EU Central - Germany0.096520.1150.160.5370.74
EU North - Finland0.021590.0400.0531.2081.7
EU North - Sweden0.010200.0290.0371.6012.2
EU West - Belgium0.035750.0540.0730.7010.97
EU West - France0.014140.0330.0430.9821.4
EU West - Ireland0.074990.0930.130.3950.55
EU West - UK (London)0.062540.0810.110.6440.89
EU-27 average0.062650.0810.11not availablenot available
Global average0.128270.1470.2not availablenot available
Netherlands0.071190.0900.120.9211.3
US Central - Iowa0.125320.1440.20.8461.2
US East - N. Virginia0.080650.0990.130.6420.89
US South - Southeast0.114420.1330.180.6350.88
US South Central - Texas0.099620.1180.160.3930.54
US West - Oregon0.085920.1040.142.5403.5

Which region is best for frontier models?

EU North - Sweden gives the lowest total for class C, 0.0286 kg CO₂e per million tokens; Asia Pacific - Singapore the highest, 0.151 kg, a 5.3 times spread. In low-carbon regions the hardware and training terms become the larger share of the total, which is why the spread on the total is smaller than the spread on electricity alone (13 times).

How much water does a frontier model use per query?

A 1210-token query to a class C model consumes about not available mL of water on the global average, from 0.54 mL in the lowest-water region to 3.5 mL in the highest. On-site cooling water plus the water embedded in grid electricity.

Which models are class C, and what about reasoning models?

Class C covers gpt-4, gpt-4-turbo, gpt-5. Providers do not disclose parameter counts, so the class comes from the published tier and benchmark behaviour, and SOMA keeps the mapping current. Reasoning modes (o1, o3, DeepSeek-R1, extended thinking) generate more tokens per answer; when token counts come from billing that is already in the number. No public source gives a reasoning-token multiplier, so for estimates from message counts SOMA multiplies the estimated output tokens by 1 + s_r(k - 1), with k an author assumption and s_r the 5% of Claude.ai conversations in which the Anthropic Economic Index reports thinking switched on (a share of conversations, not of tokens, and likely low for later years).

The conservative high case adds 58% to the class total.

Where do these numbers come from and how do I cite them?

Electricity term: GPU energy per token from the ML.ENERGY Leaderboard v3, a facility overhead of 1.20, and grid carbon intensity from EPA eGRID 2023 and Ember 2023. Embodied hardware, data-centre construction and amortised training terms are documented on the methodology page. Water combines on-site cooling water (Li et al. 2025) with the water embedded in grid electricity (Reig et al. 2020). The modelled range of the models inside a class, around the class value, is −41% to +48% for class A, −39% to +24% for class B and −67% to +55% for class C.

Dataset: AI Inference Emission and Resource Factors for Corporate GHG Inventories, Llopis, G., SOMA AI, October 2026, CC BY 4.0, concept DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20443585, which resolves to the latest version (this version 10.5281/zenodo.23371447). Method: Accounting for Purchased AI Inference in Corporate GHG Inventories: A Token-Based Method, arXiv:2606.10660, under peer review.

Partners can fetch any row from the AI factors API.